Philosophically speaking , there is no such matter as computer generated art . Even in its closely automated state , the process of creating art depends on gracious artistic judgments . Even if the art is created by data track reachs over a photograph , the original photo was composed and captured by humans and the artistic decisions about how to design and implement the filter were also made by humans . Simply running filters over photos may be bad art unless it is still not quite computer generated art . At least until the advent of some(prenominal) better A .I , no computers will spontaneously make art - computers only encourage human artists in making art .
No maven would speak of a statue as being foundry generated nevertheless beca expenditure it was taken from a wax original and recreated using molds and tan , even if the process had been fully automated Similarly , artists who use computers as their tools and cultivate in digital media would have either right to be offended at having their work referred to as having been generated by the computer . As one artist says , on that point is also a perception .that the computer does all the work . This is why I think there is resistance to accept digitally created art , as art .this is not trustworthy (Seegmiller , 2004 ,.33 . This disclaimer is specifically necessary because computer-aided work appears to be an progressively significant part of modern art movements , so much so that it is being heralded as similar to the ledger entry of photography or acrylic paint...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper